September 30, 2007

California Department of Education Settles Lawsuit with American Diabetes Association

The American Diabetes Association and the California Department of Education have settled a lawsuit that reinforces laws to protect diabetic students. In the settlement the students must have access on their campus to diabetes-related services, such as blood testing and insulin injections.

If a school nurse or family member is unavailable, then a volunteer can be trained to administer the insulin injection. A shortage of California school nurses and liability concerns about training non medical staff could stall the effects of the settlement.

550152_diabetes.jpgAccording to a recent article in the Press Enterprise, “… the California School Nurses Organization sent a letter advising school nurses to seek guidance from district lawyers before proceeding. Executive Director Nancy Spradling said nurses were concerned about losing their licenses should they train non-medical staff.”

The Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund reports that the settlement includes the following provisions:
• Districts cannot centralize diabetes-related services at one school. They must be
available at every school.
• Districts must identify and evaluate diabetic students.
• Financial burden is no defense for not providing services.
• If no school nurse or authorized personnel is available, a volunteer with adequate
training can administer insulin.

The question remains: Will the California School Nurses Organization assist in the implementation of this settlement of choose another path?

September 20, 2007

AOL & KaZaa Could be Added to RIAA v. Santangelo Lawsuit

The RIAA (Record Industry Association of America) has filed an estimated 20,000 lawsuits in the last 3 years against people (many of them unnamed “John Does”) for downloading music on P2P networks. One such lawsuit was filed against siblings Michelle and Robert Santangelo who have filed a motion to add AOL and Sharman Networks/KaZaa as third party defendants.

684555_digital_music.jpg

In this legal strategy, the Santangelos are demanding approximately $3.9 million each from AOL & Sharman. Their claim is that AOL did not take any actions to block file sharing and did not warn Michelle and Robert about consequences. The revised Complaint also blames KaZaa for designing software which automatically shares downloaded files. It also alleges that both AOL and Sharman failed to pass on RIAA warnings related to the legality and consequences of file sharing.

If the Santangelos are successful other P2P defendants in RIAA suits would likely sue their internet service and file sharing network providers for damages. Further, it could lead to file sharing software providers and ISP’s changing how they handle file downloading and uploading on the internet.

The strategy of adding other parties (especially larger companies with deeper pockets) to business lawsuits has been around a long time. It requires a special set of conditions...

Continue reading "AOL & KaZaa Could be Added to RIAA v. Santangelo Lawsuit" »

September 5, 2007

SunRocket Files Lawsuit Against Vonage: Is Customer List Confidential?

SunRocket (or what is left of it) is suing Vonage over the acquisition and use of its customer list. The complaint alleges that SunRocket had discussions with Vonage regarding the purchase of certain SunRocket assets including its subscriber base and/or customer list. Prior to those discussions, which ultimately broke down, Vonage signed a confidentiality agreement. SunRocket claims Vonage violated the confidentiality agreement by obtaining and using its customer list without permission.

854196%20market%20share%20pie%20chrt.jpg
Vonage, the number one VoIP provider in the US claims it obtained the list legally by purchasing the list from a third-party broker, Paradysz Matera. Charlie Sahner, a spokesman for Vonage stated “We obtained the subscriber list through an established broker, and we were assured the data was legally obtained and could be used without violating anyone's proprietary rights. There is no connection to the [confidentiality] agreement."

SunRocket said that its customer list is "one of its single most valuable remaining assets," and that Vonage's use of the list has caused "immediate and irreparable harm and injury" to the company. SunRocket has asked a judge to compel Vonage to return the list and award unspecified monetary damages.

Continue reading "SunRocket Files Lawsuit Against Vonage: Is Customer List Confidential?" »